000 03719nam a22005057a 4500
020 _a9780414070523
082 _a347.771
_bTER
100 _aBirss,Colin (Ed.)
100 _aAndrew Waugh(Ed.)
100 _aMitcheson,Tom (Ed.)
100 _aHinchliffe,Tom (Ed.)
100 _aTurner,Justin (Ed.)
100 _aCampbell,Douglas (Ed.)
245 _aTerrell on the Law of Patents
250 _a18 th ed.
260 _aLondon
_bSweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters
_c2019
300 _axli, 196 p.
_b24 cm.
490 _aIntellectual Property Library
500 _aTerrell on the Law of Patents is the undisputed authority on the law of patents in the United Kingdom. Providing guidance from application to infringement since 1884 and regularly cited in court, Terrell is the essential reference for anyone seeking practical and clear guidance on patent law, practice and procedure.
520 _aThis third cumulative supplement updates the eighteenth edition with the latest developments, including the key Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases of: Warner-Lambert v Generics [2018] UKSC 56 on the new approach to plausibility and what is the test for patent infringement in second medical use cases? Icescape v Ice-World [2018] EWCA Civ 2219 on how the new test of patent infringement as identified by the Supreme Court in Actavis (the doctrine of equivalents) is to be applied in practice. Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344 on what is the precise nature of the obligation upon a patent owner whose patent has been declared essential to one or more international telecommunication standards? Regeneron v Kymab [2018] EWCA Civ 671 on what is the correct approach to insufficiency and what relief should be granted to a successful patentee in a biotech case? Jushi v OCV [2018] EWCA Civ 1416 on what is the correct approach to numerical limits in patent claims? Terrell continues to be the leading authority with this supplement bringing the eighteenth edition fully up-to-date on patent law in the United Kingdom: Includes the most significant case law from all levels of the UK Courts, the European Patent Office and the UK Intellectual Property Office Clarifies the principles of patent infringement as well as outlining statutory exceptions and other defences Covers supplementary protection certificates (SPCs), the conditions for granting SPCs and their effects Outlines the grounds for revocation as defined by the Patents Act 1977 Goes through the different types of invalidity including lack of novelty, obviousness, and insufficiency
650 _aPatents
650 _aRemedies for infringement
650 _aRevocation proceedings
650 _aAction to restrain threats
650 _aUse by the crown. Stamp duty, income tax, etc.
650 _aThe Unified Patent Court
650 _aThe nature of patentable indentions
650 _aThe application
650 _aThe granted patent
650 _aSupplementary protection certificates
650 _aPriority date
650 _aThe “person skilled in the art” and common general knowledge
650 _aConstruction of the specification and claims
650 _aInvalidity and the grounds of revocation
650 _aInvalidity due to lack of novelty (anticipation)
650 _aInvalidity due to obviousness (lack of inventive step)
650 _aInvalidity due to insufficiency
650 _aPatent infringement
650 _aAmendment of specifications
650 _aDevolution, assignments and licences, co-ownership and registration
650 _aCompulsory licenses and licenses of right
650 _aFRAND
650 _aThe Intellectual Property Enterprise Court
942 _cBK
999 _c344874
_d344874