000 | 03733nam a22003377a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
020 | _a9789041190970 | ||
082 |
_a347.77:341.62 _bHEA |
||
100 | _aHeath,Christopher (Ed.) | ||
100 | _aSanders,Anselm Kamperman (Ed.) | ||
245 | _aIntellectual property and international dispute resolution | ||
260 |
_aThe Netherlands _bKluwer law _cc 2019 |
||
300 |
_axx, 266p. _b25 cm. |
||
500 | _aInvestor dispute tribunals, as provided for in many bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, are suspected of intransparency, because proceedings are not public, of unequal treatment, because they give foreign investors a right of action where domestic investors would have none, and of undermining democracy, because they allow democratically enacted laws to be challenged with no possibility of appeal. In this important book – the first in-depth treatment of the interface between intellectual property rights and international dispute resolution – a number of prominent legal scholars and practitioners examine the extent to which challenges against domestic legislation based on an alleged direct or indirect expropriation of intellectual property rights may be justified. | ||
520 | _aThe contributions cover such aspects as: history and current practice of international dispute resolution; direct application of international agreements by national courts; comparison of investor dispute settlement tribunals with other fora such as the WTO or domestic courts for determining compliance with international intellectual property standards; what can be considered ‘investment’ and ‘expropriation’ in the field of intellectual property; legislative freedom to operate when limiting intellectual property rights, particularly in the field of health and safety; and how societal interests could influence future legislation in the field of intellectual property law. One major focus of the book are the challenges against tobacco plain packaging legislation before domestic and international courts and tribunals. The book’s detailed analysis of the nature of investor dispute tribunals and how they may conflict with public interests – and its exploration of possible alternatives – is sure to be of great interest to policymakers, practitioners and scholars in both international trade law and intellectual property law. | ||
650 | _aInvestor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in the Field of Intellectual Property Law and Beyond Christopher Heath and Anselm Kamperman Sanders | ||
650 | _aLessons for International Intellectual Property Law and Policy | ||
650 | _aThe Tobacco Plain Packaging Legislation before Investor-State Tribunals | ||
650 | _aThe WTO Disputes regarding Tobacco Plain Packaging: Selected TRIPS Findings from the Panel Stage | ||
650 | _aDISPUTES INVOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, NAMELY PLAIN PACKAGING LEGISLATION | ||
650 | _aIntellectual Property as Investment and the Implications for Industrial Policy | ||
650 | _aUnpacking Constitutional Protection for Trade Marks: The Plain Packaging Disputes before National Courts | ||
650 | _aGIVING EFFECT TO INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS – HISTORY AND PROCEDURE | ||
650 | _aDispute Resolution in International and Bilateral Agreements | ||
650 | _aThe History of Investment Tribunals and the Protection of IPRs under Investment Treaties Flavia Marisi and Julien Chaisse | ||
650 | _aDispute Resolution Under the WTO Regime | ||
650 | _aThe Direct Application of International IP Agreements before National Courts | ||
650 | _aThe Pathways of Multinational Intellectual Property Dispute Settlement | ||
700 | _aChristopher Heath | ||
700 | _aAnselm Kamperman Sanders | ||
942 | _cBK | ||
999 |
_c348707 _d348707 |